Why I’m Backing the Colts

By Dalton Del Don

Immediately after the Championship games, I was convinced I was backing Indy in the Super Bowl. Of course, it’s never smart to overly rely on the last game played, and considering the Saints are a No. 1 seed that had the far better point differential throughout the season, I assumed the spread would be around three points and certainly not approaching seven like it has been. Plenty of Colts games this season were close, and five-six points is quite a bit to be laying against a team that has a legitimate argument as the best in the NFL, especially on a neutral field. This is essentially saying Indy would be favored by nine points if they were at home, which is pretty crazy. Moreover, the Colts beat the No. 5 and No. 6 seeds at home to get into the Super Bowl, while New Orleans annihilated a good Cardinals squad before beating a Vikings team that could also easily be viewed as the best in football, even if the Saints were lucky in doing so. Dwight Freeney’s injury is obviously a big concern (although conversely, the lack of a pure pass rusher may actually hurt the Saints’ screen game, an area in which they excel), and there’s a 30 percent chance of precipitation, which would probably help the underdogs. Another injury that seems to be underrated is the one to talented young DB Jerraud Powers, who is questionable with a foot problem that kept him out of the AFC Championship game. Secondary depth will sure mean a whole lot more against the Saints than it did versus the Ravens and Jets.

Delving into the Xs and Os, it’s fairly simple; both teams have mediocre run defenses, underrated secondaries and strong passing attacks, although the Saints’ ground game is noticeably better. And then there’s Peyton Manning, who is probably the best football player ever. Drew Brees had a terrific season with gaudy stats, but so did Philip Rivers. And Tony Romo. Manning is simply in a class by himself and is currently the most important player in sports. When Brees played outdoors this year, his numbers took a precipitous drop (7.7 YPA, 9:5 TD:INT ratio compared to 9.0 YPA, 25:6 TD:INT indoors), whereas Manning’s YPA actually increased from 7.5 indoors to 8.2 outdoors; it might not mean much, but it’s something to think about. While Manning was picked off 16 times this season (the most since 2002), and New Orleans’ 26 interceptions were the third-most in the NFL in 2009, with two weeks to prepare and on the biggest stage possible, I just don’t see this remaining a team strength for the Saints. Moreover, New Orleans loves to blitz, which is suicide against Manning, and the vaunted Saints’ passing game faces an Indy secondary that allowed just 6.2 YPA this season – the third-lowest in the league. Put simply, the matchup doesn’t exactly favor New Orleans.

Right now it’s clear the public is all over the Colts, and the sharps are supposedly backing the Saints, but in my opinion, this means far less in the playoffs, especially the Super Bowl (Vegas takes advantage of these situations over big samples, plus they could easily lose ATS yet kill on the O/U, which appears to have a bunch of action on the “sucker side” – the over). My early Indy convictions have definitely been tested over the past 10 days, and this is a game I’d recommend staying away from if not for it being the Super Bowl (of course you have to bet!). Five-six points is quite a lot in a seemingly even matchup, and even a straight MLB on New Orleans makes sense, but I’m backing the Colts to cover Sunday, and it’s pretty much because of one single player.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

10 responses to “Why I’m Backing the Colts”

  1. scheub Avatar
    scheub

    For the majority of that post I thought you were defending the Saints. So you’re basing your Colts covering on Peyton, ignoring his fairly pedestrian stats in his previous post season appearances? I’m not arguing that he isn’t the best ever, I’m just saying I have a little trouble putting that much faith on a team that relies so heavily on one player. Especially when that player has shown that, in the past, he can under perform in pressure situations.

    I’ve been on the Saints all season, no reason to stop now: Saints 38-35. Oh and also the NFL Madden simulation for this game predicted the Saints winning (it’s correctly predicted 5 of the last 6), so if that’s not a sure thing, I don’t know what is.

  2. Dreamweapon Avatar
    Dreamweapon

    Don’t get me wrong, I hate the guy, but aren’t the Lakers without Kobe just as bad as the Colts without Manning?

  3. Carli Avatar
    Carli

    Scheuber- That’s way too high of a score and you’ve got the wrong team winning the game.

  4. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    Scheub – Like I said, you could be right. But Indy has a pretty good pass defense, and I have far more confidence in Peyton bringing his “A” game than I do Brees.

  5. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    Dreamweapon – Not even close! Are you kidding me? The Lakers would still have Gasol, Bynum, Odom and Artest – they’d easily make the playoffs. The Colts would probably be something like 2-14 without Manning. A better comparison would be LeBron, since he’s both now (far) superior to Kobe, and his teammates are brutal.

  6. Dreamweapon Avatar
    Dreamweapon

    Yeah, I already immediately thought of James after posting. If you’re talking about importance, I’d take either of them over any football player, no matter who it was–Manning now, mid-90s Reggie White, 80s Montana, early-60s Jim Brown, doesn’t matter. And as you know, I don’t even like pro basketball, I think it’s largely garbage at this point, I would rather take a nap than watch a regular season NBA game. Perhaps it’s too rudimentary, but to me, generally speaking, way smaller teams equals way bigger opportunity for individual impact, and the players play both ways and are thus on the court for ~90% of game clock instead of ~50% in football. Making the playoffs in basketball means next to nothing to me, sub-.500 teams make it all the time. The fact that his teammates could probably stumble their way to a 40-win record in a league where maybe a dozen players in total actually give a shit about the regular season isn’t very impressive. I don’t see the Colts being Lions-class bad, they had the #8 overall scoring D despite having little incentive to play hard in the second half of many of their games. I’d call them between 6-10 and 9-7 with a league average QB, the entire range of which is no different to me than a #7 or 8 seed and attendant first-round NBA playoff exit. Which, while I don’t know much about Bynum, is precisely what I would expect any team led by mopes and clowns of Gasol’s, Odom’s or Artest’s caliber to earn. I just don’t see how anyone could possibly make a sincere argument that those guys sniff a title without Bryant, so he’s already proven as indispensable to his team as Manning could possibly be–no Kobe, no title, pure and simple. Manning is great and all, probably a better overall player in his sport than Bryant is, but as far as importance to their teams’ success, they’re at best indistinguishable.

  7. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    First off, you are underrating Gasol, who is a top-10 player in the NBA. And Bynum is legit too – his numbers would look much better if Kobe wasn’t on the team taking 22.5 shots per game. Also, Phil Jackson is possibly the best coach in NBA history as well (I tend to disagree with this notion, but the point being they are well coached). But I’m not a Kobe hater – dude is awesome, obviously, and I also agree with your general point in that it’s much easier to make an impact as one player in basketball than it is baseball or football.

    But James is a much better example in this case, since he has inferior teammates and has also surpassed Kobe as the best player in the league (and this is no longer even debatable). Actually, Durant is possibly even better at this stage too (which is insane since he’s 21 years old).

    But quarterback is BY FAR the toughest position to play in sports, and also one that can have an inordinate impact on a franchise. We are arguing semantics, and I do agree with your general point, but P. Manning is pretty damn valuable.

  8. Walt Weiss Avatar
    Walt Weiss

    This was a well written article, but it was entirely wrong in its conclusion. Who dat? The Saints are going to win outright in a blow-out. You are on the wrong side of History. Who dat? Peyton Manning will not survive the first quarter. Although the Colts do have a good back-up in that guy from Purdue who is not Drew Brees, the Saints have the guy from Purdue who is Drew Brees. Again, I ask who dat? Besides, who do you think Manning is really rooting for?

  9. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    Honestly, a Saints win wouldn’t surprise. A “blowout” by them, on the other hand, would definitely shock me. Good luck Walt Weiss! Manning is going to ball tomorrow.

  10. Dreamweapon Avatar
    Dreamweapon

    Walt Weiss FTW.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *