<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-329205</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-329205</guid>
		<description>Looks like Price still needs some time before he&#039;s fantasy ace material. I think he&#039;ll def. improve (tough not to at this point), but I wouldn&#039;t expect a top-30 SP over the second half of the season. 

G. Beckham looks for real, but like Price, I still expect growing pains. I&#039;d hold onto Tulow unless the price is right.

Obviously, this last question is very team specific, but in a vacuum, I&#039;d actually prefer Haren, but it&#039;s close. Pitchers are inherently riskier, but I expect Crawford&#039;s SB pace to drop off (which it has started to), and Haren is legit. Seems like equal value, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Price still needs some time before he&#8217;s fantasy ace material. I think he&#8217;ll def. improve (tough not to at this point), but I wouldn&#8217;t expect a top-30 SP over the second half of the season. </p>
<p>G. Beckham looks for real, but like Price, I still expect growing pains. I&#8217;d hold onto Tulow unless the price is right.</p>
<p>Obviously, this last question is very team specific, but in a vacuum, I&#8217;d actually prefer Haren, but it&#8217;s close. Pitchers are inherently riskier, but I expect Crawford&#8217;s SB pace to drop off (which it has started to), and Haren is legit. Seems like equal value, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A2K</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-329172</link>
		<dc:creator>A2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-329172</guid>
		<description>TripNasty

Upside question here. Your thoughts on David Price. Those walks are getting pretty out of control; do you think he figures it out? Crystal ball me a second half.

Is Gordan Beckham worth holding onto in order to deal Tulo. Does he put up a huge second half to steam to the top of ROY ballots?

Always enjoy the provoked and unprovoked insight.
Always grateful for the feedback

Lastly, in a vacuum. Hot Carl Crawford for Dan Haren&#039;s Harem? You get Carl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TripNasty</p>
<p>Upside question here. Your thoughts on David Price. Those walks are getting pretty out of control; do you think he figures it out? Crystal ball me a second half.</p>
<p>Is Gordan Beckham worth holding onto in order to deal Tulo. Does he put up a huge second half to steam to the top of ROY ballots?</p>
<p>Always enjoy the provoked and unprovoked insight.<br />
Always grateful for the feedback</p>
<p>Lastly, in a vacuum. Hot Carl Crawford for Dan Haren&#8217;s Harem? You get Carl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-329013</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-329013</guid>
		<description>Yes, I expect all to perform much better over the second half of the season. It looks like Rios is going to be a good, not great player (although he can still be great in fantasy). Remember, his first half last year was a huge disappointment. I still believe in Drew and would be buying there. I like him. As for Hart, his walks are way up, but he Ks too often, and that swing is just sooo long. And he&#039;s not running nearly as much. I don&#039;t love him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I expect all to perform much better over the second half of the season. It looks like Rios is going to be a good, not great player (although he can still be great in fantasy). Remember, his first half last year was a huge disappointment. I still believe in Drew and would be buying there. I like him. As for Hart, his walks are way up, but he Ks too often, and that swing is just sooo long. And he&#8217;s not running nearly as much. I don&#8217;t love him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidian</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-329008</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-329008</guid>
		<description>Dalton, what do you make of the season long slumps of Stephen Drew, Cory Hart and Alex Rios? Are they due to break out at any point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton, what do you make of the season long slumps of Stephen Drew, Cory Hart and Alex Rios? Are they due to break out at any point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-329000</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-329000</guid>
		<description>Thanks man. And I agree with what you said. Cain really is an interesting case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks man. And I agree with what you said. Cain really is an interesting case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/07/the-scoop-146/comment-page-1/#comment-328994</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1046#comment-328994</guid>
		<description>DDD,

Re: &quot;so superior pitching has negated the supposed regression. It’s just something to note – just because a pitcher has been lucky, doesn’t mean he can’t improve in other areas to avoid an inevitable collapse (Matt Cain is another good example here).&quot;

Well said.  As writers and analyzers, it&#039;s often difficult to notice when a pitcher who is supposedly due for a regression has actually stepped up his game and made a correction.  

Cain is the best example because he had been one of the luckier pitchers halfway through May but has certainly turned things around.

Six weeks of great luck, coupled by a sharp improvement, are a few key elements necessary to win a Cy Young award.

I&#039;m not suggesting that Jurrgens or Cain will win that award, but their respective first halves have put the ball in their court.

Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DDD,</p>
<p>Re: &#8220;so superior pitching has negated the supposed regression. It’s just something to note – just because a pitcher has been lucky, doesn’t mean he can’t improve in other areas to avoid an inevitable collapse (Matt Cain is another good example here).&#8221;</p>
<p>Well said.  As writers and analyzers, it&#8217;s often difficult to notice when a pitcher who is supposedly due for a regression has actually stepped up his game and made a correction.  </p>
<p>Cain is the best example because he had been one of the luckier pitchers halfway through May but has certainly turned things around.</p>
<p>Six weeks of great luck, coupled by a sharp improvement, are a few key elements necessary to win a Cy Young award.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that Jurrgens or Cain will win that award, but their respective first halves have put the ball in their court.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

