<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third Base Rankings &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328839</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328839</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Glazer</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328832</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Glazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328832</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;m taking away from this list is &quot;next year get a top 3b, because the position is damn shallow.&quot;  Got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;m taking away from this list is &#8220;next year get a top 3b, because the position is damn shallow.&#8221;  Got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328821</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328821</guid>
		<description>Peter - Fair enough. I guess my basis for where to place players isn&#039;t scientific. But M. Cabrera played just 14 games at 3B last year - he&#039;s not even 3B eligible in Yahoo leagues, and Yahoo is extremely liberal with their eligibility. Blalock, meanwhile, is 3B eligible in just about all leagues, and he&#039;s obviously more valuable there than at just Util. That&#039;s why I&#039;ll also rank Sandoval at catcher. 

I just didn&#039;t want overlap guys like Youkilis, who I just ranked as a first baseman. 

I still like Blalock&#039;s upside more than a Casey Blake type, and fully expect a big jump in BA. And playing DH has kept him mostly healthy. And he&#039;s hitting in the middle of a loaded lineup in a terrific hitter&#039;s park. But he&#039;s more valuable in daily leagues where you can sit him against southpaws. And I will admit Blake has certainly been a nice surprise and exceeded my expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8211; Fair enough. I guess my basis for where to place players isn&#8217;t scientific. But M. Cabrera played just 14 games at 3B last year &#8211; he&#8217;s not even 3B eligible in Yahoo leagues, and Yahoo is extremely liberal with their eligibility. Blalock, meanwhile, is 3B eligible in just about all leagues, and he&#8217;s obviously more valuable there than at just Util. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ll also rank Sandoval at catcher. </p>
<p>I just didn&#8217;t want overlap guys like Youkilis, who I just ranked as a first baseman. </p>
<p>I still like Blalock&#8217;s upside more than a Casey Blake type, and fully expect a big jump in BA. And playing DH has kept him mostly healthy. And he&#8217;s hitting in the middle of a loaded lineup in a terrific hitter&#8217;s park. But he&#8217;s more valuable in daily leagues where you can sit him against southpaws. And I will admit Blake has certainly been a nice surprise and exceeded my expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328820</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328820</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little surprised Blalock is on this list... 

He&#039;s almost exclusively a DH; he&#039;s played 1 game at 3B this year.  If playing 1 game at the position qualifies a player for these rankings, shouldn&#039;t, for example, Youkilis be on this list?  If basing current eligibility on last year, shouldn&#039;t Miguel Cabrera be here?  

All that aside, I&#039;d much rather have a guy like Blake than Blalock.  Nevermind that Blalock&#039;s performance has been declining like he was Mike Lowell (2 HR this month after 6 in each of the previous 2, for starters)... Blalock&#039;s now losing playing time (and not just during inter-league play).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little surprised Blalock is on this list&#8230; </p>
<p>He&#8217;s almost exclusively a DH; he&#8217;s played 1 game at 3B this year.  If playing 1 game at the position qualifies a player for these rankings, shouldn&#8217;t, for example, Youkilis be on this list?  If basing current eligibility on last year, shouldn&#8217;t Miguel Cabrera be here?  </p>
<p>All that aside, I&#8217;d much rather have a guy like Blake than Blalock.  Nevermind that Blalock&#8217;s performance has been declining like he was Mike Lowell (2 HR this month after 6 in each of the previous 2, for starters)&#8230; Blalock&#8217;s now losing playing time (and not just during inter-league play).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328789</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328789</guid>
		<description>I hear what you&#039;re saying about Reynolds. I admit, I was actually way down on him entering the season, but the power is for real, and all those bags are such a nice bonus. But I totally agree there&#039;s a real risk he hits something like .230 from here on out. It&#039;s just that Chipper and Aramis are so shaky health wise, and none in the other tier are true studs.

As for Sandoval, I&#039;ll include him in my catcher rankings. And he&#039;s actually fast approaching &quot;stud&quot; status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying about Reynolds. I admit, I was actually way down on him entering the season, but the power is for real, and all those bags are such a nice bonus. But I totally agree there&#8217;s a real risk he hits something like .230 from here on out. It&#8217;s just that Chipper and Aramis are so shaky health wise, and none in the other tier are true studs.</p>
<p>As for Sandoval, I&#8217;ll include him in my catcher rankings. And he&#8217;s actually fast approaching &#8220;stud&#8221; status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Glazer</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328786</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Glazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328786</guid>
		<description>Oh come on about Reynolds.  He&#039;s just as likely to hit 210 the rest of the way as anything else.  Ian Stewart should likely be higher up.  I can see Zim higher as well, though just 1 tier up.  I know you didn&#039;t count it, but Sandoval, if catcher eligible, is way up there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on about Reynolds.  He&#8217;s just as likely to hit 210 the rest of the way as anything else.  Ian Stewart should likely be higher up.  I can see Zim higher as well, though just 1 tier up.  I know you didn&#8217;t count it, but Sandoval, if catcher eligible, is way up there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328771</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328771</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to overreact to just three months, but b/c he&#039;s running so much, hard not to rank Reynolds high. Especially with not too many great options after the first tier, although I do recognize his BA should be a liability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to overreact to just three months, but b/c he&#8217;s running so much, hard not to rank Reynolds high. Especially with not too many great options after the first tier, although I do recognize his BA should be a liability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/third-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328770</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1034#comment-328770</guid>
		<description>Huge call on Mark Reynolds.  Takes guts, and I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huge call on Mark Reynolds.  Takes guts, and I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

