<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327558</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327558</guid>
		<description>Well played Eddie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well played Eddie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327557</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327557</guid>
		<description>Dreamweapon -- In your context, it&#039;s &quot;advice,&quot; not &quot;advise.&quot; Unless, of course, you were trying to be ironic.

But it could just be a coincidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweapon &#8212; In your context, it&#8217;s &#8220;advice,&#8221; not &#8220;advise.&#8221; Unless, of course, you were trying to be ironic.</p>
<p>But it could just be a coincidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327546</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327546</guid>
		<description>Renel Brooks-Moon - I may be nuts, but I think Pavano has a bit more upside. However, Guthrie is coming off a 10:1 K:BB ratio game, so maybe he&#039;s ready to rebound. Still, with his low K rate, I&#039;ve never been a big fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renel Brooks-Moon &#8211; I may be nuts, but I think Pavano has a bit more upside. However, Guthrie is coming off a 10:1 K:BB ratio game, so maybe he&#8217;s ready to rebound. Still, with his low K rate, I&#8217;ve never been a big fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327545</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327545</guid>
		<description>I could see Matusz as a September call up, but he&#039;s more of a 2010 help than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see Matusz as a September call up, but he&#8217;s more of a 2010 help than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327544</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327544</guid>
		<description>Donald - I can get on board with your Mauer assessment - .330, 25 HR, 2nd rounder. And I hear ya about Pavano - I&#039;m sure there&#039;s an injury right around the corner anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald &#8211; I can get on board with your Mauer assessment &#8211; .330, 25 HR, 2nd rounder. And I hear ya about Pavano &#8211; I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s an injury right around the corner anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327542</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327542</guid>
		<description>Dreamweapon - I know it&#039;s ridiculous to still have an AOL account. I actually do have a gmail one and just need to transition everyone over. You&#039;re probably right about it being a lost cause, but I will fight on for now.

Good point about Greinke also dealing with anxiety issues in the past, and I agree, if K. Greene can&#039;t perform outside of Petco and under that staff, it&#039;s not looking good. And Rick Ankiel never recovered from a pitching standpoint.

Good stuff man, keep bringing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweapon &#8211; I know it&#8217;s ridiculous to still have an AOL account. I actually do have a gmail one and just need to transition everyone over. You&#8217;re probably right about it being a lost cause, but I will fight on for now.</p>
<p>Good point about Greinke also dealing with anxiety issues in the past, and I agree, if K. Greene can&#8217;t perform outside of Petco and under that staff, it&#8217;s not looking good. And Rick Ankiel never recovered from a pitching standpoint.</p>
<p>Good stuff man, keep bringing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renel Brooks-Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327540</link>
		<dc:creator>Renel Brooks-Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327540</guid>
		<description>In March I never thought I&#039;d be asking this, but... Guthrie or Pavano?  I hate - hate - how many HR Guthrie is giving up.  Maybe his FB/HR rates are out of whack and due for a correction, or maybe injury is lurking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March I never thought I&#8217;d be asking this, but&#8230; Guthrie or Pavano?  I hate &#8211; hate &#8211; how many HR Guthrie is giving up.  Maybe his FB/HR rates are out of whack and due for a correction, or maybe injury is lurking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327530</guid>
		<description>Ah--well, it sucks to hold an active bench spot open for a guy in the minors, esp. if you don&#039;t have a lot of them to begin with.  Too bad you guys don&#039;t have a minor league system, but if you have a lot of keepers (say 70+ for the league), I&#039;d say you still have to hold onto him and will probably be better off for it.  The SEC is at least as good as High-A ball and possibly a tick better than that, and he flat-out abused that conference for years, he&#039;s pretty close to a proven commodity already.  The walks sucked but he said he was working on new pitches and tons of guys let up when they&#039;re not being properly challenged.  That K/9 is absurd, and it&#039;s hard to disregard entirely despite its brevity b/c the Twins are so damn hot right now, spanking them has to mean something.

Speaking of not wanting to waste bench spots on minor league pitchers for too long, what are the odds Matusz makes it up this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8211;well, it sucks to hold an active bench spot open for a guy in the minors, esp. if you don&#8217;t have a lot of them to begin with.  Too bad you guys don&#8217;t have a minor league system, but if you have a lot of keepers (say 70+ for the league), I&#8217;d say you still have to hold onto him and will probably be better off for it.  The SEC is at least as good as High-A ball and possibly a tick better than that, and he flat-out abused that conference for years, he&#8217;s pretty close to a proven commodity already.  The walks sucked but he said he was working on new pitches and tons of guys let up when they&#8217;re not being properly challenged.  That K/9 is absurd, and it&#8217;s hard to disregard entirely despite its brevity b/c the Twins are so damn hot right now, spanking them has to mean something.</p>
<p>Speaking of not wanting to waste bench spots on minor league pitchers for too long, what are the odds Matusz makes it up this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327524</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327524</guid>
		<description>I can get used to this pace of postings.

Good info on Pavano.  I am staring at him as a FA in my other league, but am embarrassed to pull the trigger.  Seriously, he is Carl F&#039;ing Pavano.  So what now, he has a good 2009, is a free agent, and the yanks sign him to a 4 year 40 mil deal?  You read it here first!

Granted, Mauer hitting 20 more homers would put him on a 30 homer pace, which would be huge, but I can see him being a 25 hr catcher (splitting hairs?), and with a 330 ba, he isn&#039;t a top 5 player, but he is probably a 2nd rounder in most leagues (who plays in 2 catcher leagues anyway?)

By the way Dreamweapon, it was me calling Price a bust one week ago.  He has clogged up a roster spot for me for a year and a half, and after a 4 era in AAA, with too many walks, and a horrible first start, my patience was thin.  But 17K in 9 IP will change things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can get used to this pace of postings.</p>
<p>Good info on Pavano.  I am staring at him as a FA in my other league, but am embarrassed to pull the trigger.  Seriously, he is Carl F&#8217;ing Pavano.  So what now, he has a good 2009, is a free agent, and the yanks sign him to a 4 year 40 mil deal?  You read it here first!</p>
<p>Granted, Mauer hitting 20 more homers would put him on a 30 homer pace, which would be huge, but I can see him being a 25 hr catcher (splitting hairs?), and with a 330 ba, he isn&#8217;t a top 5 player, but he is probably a 2nd rounder in most leagues (who plays in 2 catcher leagues anyway?)</p>
<p>By the way Dreamweapon, it was me calling Price a bust one week ago.  He has clogged up a roster spot for me for a year and a half, and after a 4 era in AAA, with too many walks, and a horrible first start, my patience was thin.  But 17K in 9 IP will change things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Scoop &#124; The NBA Info Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327519</link>
		<dc:creator>The Scoop &#124; The NBA Info Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327519</guid>
		<description>[...] more here: The Scoop   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more here: The Scoop   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/the-scoop-136/comment-page-1/#comment-327503</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=999#comment-327503</guid>
		<description>Haha, man, having worked in IT support in pre-Netscape 1.0 days, i.e. before dimwitted AOL users wrecked Usenet in a cataclysmic flood of retardation (and I know you have an AOL account, but trust me, that would the exception that proves the rule--your kinsmen did more to wreck internet grammar/spelling/civility standards than a million Chinese hackers could ever have dreamed), I have witnessed a fantastic regression in spelling and grammar standards over the past fifteen years.  My advise is that it&#039;s a lost cause.  There are only so many times you can tell a strident imbecile that there&#039;s no such word as &quot;irregardless&quot;, or delineate the difference between contractions and possessive pronouns for people who only obtained HS diplomas due to social promotion, or mock the, well, irony of a jagoff screaming about some prosaic thing being &quot;rediculas&quot;.  You may as well go stand on a skerry and attempt to command the tides themselves for all the good it will do you, the battle is lost.  The fact of the matter is that Huxley&#039;s Brave New World has already arrived, and people like most of the readers of this site happen to be Alphas and Betas surrounded by a sea of mouth-breathing Epsilons to whom we bestowed the gift of instant and near-free publication without taking time to consider the ramifications.  Let this be a lesson for when the flying cars finally arrive.  

As for the anxiety issues, remember Zack Greinke went through this himself just a couple of years ago and was essentially out of the game for a season.  We can probably stick a fork in Greene, he&#039;s been a disappointment his entire career, and Willis&#039; thing could have easily been made up as a convenient way to make him go away for a while, but Votto can probably bounce back.  It would be interesting to hear more about this and the issues that affect athletes in particular in recent times.  I was somewhat fascinated by what happened to Chuck Knoblauch when he just completely lost his release point, he looked like a girl throwing a frisbee for the first time.  There&#039;s a lot of issues at play here--technology has exploded at such an exponential rate over the past couple of generations, every decade the pace of life and intrusions on privacy seem to double or more.  It&#039;s doubtless the biggest adaptation humankind has had to make, and in evolutionary terms, I don&#039;t know that the species has the ability to keep pace en masse at the present rate.  Some of the anxiety cases, all of the mental illnesses, autism, etc. could be impacted by this.  I don&#039;t know, it&#039;d be interesting to read more on it. 

Funny you mention Pavano, I&#039;ve been yo-yoing him on and off the FA heap for a few days now, I have to keep dropping him to get two-start pitchers or replacements for injured OFs, but I&#039;m definitely going to grab him again before his next start.  It&#039;s hard to have a lot of faith, but the numbers look good.  

Speaking of, any Sizemore or Hamilton owners who haven&#039;t already done so need to rush out and grab Scott Hairston.  I did so early yesterday when I heard about Sizemore, since then all he&#039;s done is go 4-for-7 with four runs, 2 homers and a steal.  He looks like a Neanderthal, granted, but the production is hard to deny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, man, having worked in IT support in pre-Netscape 1.0 days, i.e. before dimwitted AOL users wrecked Usenet in a cataclysmic flood of retardation (and I know you have an AOL account, but trust me, that would the exception that proves the rule&#8211;your kinsmen did more to wreck internet grammar/spelling/civility standards than a million Chinese hackers could ever have dreamed), I have witnessed a fantastic regression in spelling and grammar standards over the past fifteen years.  My advise is that it&#8217;s a lost cause.  There are only so many times you can tell a strident imbecile that there&#8217;s no such word as &#8220;irregardless&#8221;, or delineate the difference between contractions and possessive pronouns for people who only obtained HS diplomas due to social promotion, or mock the, well, irony of a jagoff screaming about some prosaic thing being &#8220;rediculas&#8221;.  You may as well go stand on a skerry and attempt to command the tides themselves for all the good it will do you, the battle is lost.  The fact of the matter is that Huxley&#8217;s Brave New World has already arrived, and people like most of the readers of this site happen to be Alphas and Betas surrounded by a sea of mouth-breathing Epsilons to whom we bestowed the gift of instant and near-free publication without taking time to consider the ramifications.  Let this be a lesson for when the flying cars finally arrive.  </p>
<p>As for the anxiety issues, remember Zack Greinke went through this himself just a couple of years ago and was essentially out of the game for a season.  We can probably stick a fork in Greene, he&#8217;s been a disappointment his entire career, and Willis&#8217; thing could have easily been made up as a convenient way to make him go away for a while, but Votto can probably bounce back.  It would be interesting to hear more about this and the issues that affect athletes in particular in recent times.  I was somewhat fascinated by what happened to Chuck Knoblauch when he just completely lost his release point, he looked like a girl throwing a frisbee for the first time.  There&#8217;s a lot of issues at play here&#8211;technology has exploded at such an exponential rate over the past couple of generations, every decade the pace of life and intrusions on privacy seem to double or more.  It&#8217;s doubtless the biggest adaptation humankind has had to make, and in evolutionary terms, I don&#8217;t know that the species has the ability to keep pace en masse at the present rate.  Some of the anxiety cases, all of the mental illnesses, autism, etc. could be impacted by this.  I don&#8217;t know, it&#8217;d be interesting to read more on it. </p>
<p>Funny you mention Pavano, I&#8217;ve been yo-yoing him on and off the FA heap for a few days now, I have to keep dropping him to get two-start pitchers or replacements for injured OFs, but I&#8217;m definitely going to grab him again before his next start.  It&#8217;s hard to have a lot of faith, but the numbers look good.  </p>
<p>Speaking of, any Sizemore or Hamilton owners who haven&#8217;t already done so need to rush out and grab Scott Hairston.  I did so early yesterday when I heard about Sizemore, since then all he&#8217;s done is go 4-for-7 with four runs, 2 homers and a steal.  He looks like a Neanderthal, granted, but the production is hard to deny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

