<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Base Rankings &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328769</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328769</guid>
		<description>I should point out I&#039;m going to try not to overlap guys who qualify at multiple positions - I&#039;ll just go by what position they have played most. But you&#039;re right about Branyan and 3rd base. 

Pena and Howard aren&#039;t too different, but Howard has been more durable, and he did post a monster 58-HR, 148-RBI season a couple years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should point out I&#8217;m going to try not to overlap guys who qualify at multiple positions &#8211; I&#8217;ll just go by what position they have played most. But you&#8217;re right about Branyan and 3rd base. </p>
<p>Pena and Howard aren&#8217;t too different, but Howard has been more durable, and he did post a monster 58-HR, 148-RBI season a couple years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Glazer</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328768</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Glazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328768</guid>
		<description>But and this is a big one, Branyan has 3b eligibility almost everywhere.  The flexibility boosts him.

And really, how different are Pena and Howard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But and this is a big one, Branyan has 3b eligibility almost everywhere.  The flexibility boosts him.</p>
<p>And really, how different are Pena and Howard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328717</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328717</guid>
		<description>Aaron - Interesting I figured most would say that&#039;s too low for Howard. As for Branyan, I&#039;ve always thought he should get a chance at regular PT, but with all those Ks, a huge BA crash is likely in store. And that lineup hurts him too - 19 homers yet just 38 RBI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron &#8211; Interesting I figured most would say that&#8217;s too low for Howard. As for Branyan, I&#8217;ve always thought he should get a chance at regular PT, but with all those Ks, a huge BA crash is likely in store. And that lineup hurts him too &#8211; 19 homers yet just 38 RBI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328716</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328716</guid>
		<description>Donald - I could see moving Berkman and Pena up one tier and starting the next one with Konerko. Pena has legitimate 45-homer power. But that BA is a drain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald &#8211; I could see moving Berkman and Pena up one tier and starting the next one with Konerko. Pena has legitimate 45-homer power. But that BA is a drain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Glazer</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328704</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Glazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328704</guid>
		<description>At this point I feel like Youk and Howard are too high, as I really don&#039;t see the difference between them and Votto and Adrian/Pena going forward.  Pena is definately too low, as, likely, is Branyan, strange as that is to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I feel like Youk and Howard are too high, as I really don&#8217;t see the difference between them and Votto and Adrian/Pena going forward.  Pena is definately too low, as, likely, is Branyan, strange as that is to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/06/first-base-rankings-update/comment-page-1/#comment-328696</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotoscoop.com/?p=1032#comment-328696</guid>
		<description>As a Pena owner, I cannot accept his tier.  While Yahoo has him currently ranked between Tex and Andrian, I refuse you placing him in the same tier as Konerko.
I do love that you are making some position by position lists, and think this is pretty much right on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Pena owner, I cannot accept his tier.  While Yahoo has him currently ranked between Tex and Andrian, I refuse you placing him in the same tier as Konerko.<br />
I do love that you are making some position by position lists, and think this is pretty much right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

