<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317120</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317120</guid>
		<description>3D, let me know when u set the league up, EMail me at BK77RLS@yahoo.com, thanks a bunch...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3D, let me know when u set the league up, EMail me at <a href="mailto:BK77RLS@yahoo.com">BK77RLS@yahoo.com</a>, thanks a bunch&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317101</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317101</guid>
		<description>Keith - I remember that Felix game against Boston. I think it was on ESPN, and their radar gun had him throwing like 98 mph split fingers. 

Anyway, regarding Myers - maybe I did have him too low in my rankings. He was unlucky the first half last year, and he was legit afterward. I do think he&#039;ll remain homer-prone, and his dip in velocity is of some concern, but he&#039;s entering a contract year and showed up in terrific shape (make of that what you will). 

Here&#039;s a good article stating his case:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/the-double-unlucky-pitching-staff/

Bottom line - I had him too low. Maybe it was bias b/c he burnt me last year. I was high on him entering 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith &#8211; I remember that Felix game against Boston. I think it was on ESPN, and their radar gun had him throwing like 98 mph split fingers. </p>
<p>Anyway, regarding Myers &#8211; maybe I did have him too low in my rankings. He was unlucky the first half last year, and he was legit afterward. I do think he&#8217;ll remain homer-prone, and his dip in velocity is of some concern, but he&#8217;s entering a contract year and showed up in terrific shape (make of that what you will). </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good article stating his case:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/the-double-unlucky-pitching-staff/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/the-double-unlucky-pitching-staff/</a></p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; I had him too low. Maybe it was bias b/c he burnt me last year. I was high on him entering 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317099</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317099</guid>
		<description>Donald - I agree those stats are eye-opening regarding Holliday.  So crazy Felix is still that young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald &#8211; I agree those stats are eye-opening regarding Holliday.  So crazy Felix is still that young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317086</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317086</guid>
		<description>I think Beltran vs. Holliday will be close. I tried trading for Holliday pitching the Colorado vs. Oakland thing - and saying I just wanted him since I&#039;m an A&#039;s fan, but wasn&#039;t so lucky. I did however end up landing Beltran, and since my league counts BB&#039;s as well, I think he&#039;s very close to a 1st-round player. My main concern with Beltran is health, because he does lose a lot of value if he&#039;s not running, and the types of injuries that keep you from running aren&#039;t always the kind that send you to the DL, so you can&#039;t always use + replacement level theory.

I&#039;m still rolling with The King in both my keeper leagues. I did feel better about him prior to some of the supporting stats taking a turn for the worse, but I just think back to some of the games I&#039;ve seen him pitch against the A&#039;s and how unhittable he looks, or the game against the Red Sox where he struck out 12 and let all of two balls out of the infield or something obscene like that.  I&#039;m holding the faith.

I&#039;m pretty high on Brett Myers for this year, but your SP rankings aren&#039;t. I&#039;m just curious why that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Beltran vs. Holliday will be close. I tried trading for Holliday pitching the Colorado vs. Oakland thing &#8211; and saying I just wanted him since I&#8217;m an A&#8217;s fan, but wasn&#8217;t so lucky. I did however end up landing Beltran, and since my league counts BB&#8217;s as well, I think he&#8217;s very close to a 1st-round player. My main concern with Beltran is health, because he does lose a lot of value if he&#8217;s not running, and the types of injuries that keep you from running aren&#8217;t always the kind that send you to the DL, so you can&#8217;t always use + replacement level theory.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still rolling with The King in both my keeper leagues. I did feel better about him prior to some of the supporting stats taking a turn for the worse, but I just think back to some of the games I&#8217;ve seen him pitch against the A&#8217;s and how unhittable he looks, or the game against the Red Sox where he struck out 12 and let all of two balls out of the infield or something obscene like that.  I&#8217;m holding the faith.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty high on Brett Myers for this year, but your SP rankings aren&#8217;t. I&#8217;m just curious why that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317073</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317073</guid>
		<description>It seems like people are disrespecting king felix.  dude is only 22.  sure, seattle stinks, but the king is nasty, and did we mention his age yet?  not a single person mentioned him in the previous 20 comments.  Disrespect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like people are disrespecting king felix.  dude is only 22.  sure, seattle stinks, but the king is nasty, and did we mention his age yet?  not a single person mentioned him in the previous 20 comments.  Disrespect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Trump</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317070</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Trump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 14:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317070</guid>
		<description>I did read the comments to the OF ratings, and the coments on holiday getting better the further he is from coors, but man, when you line up those stats like that, my view on him has definitely changed.  Thanks for the link Dreamweapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the comments to the OF ratings, and the coments on holiday getting better the further he is from coors, but man, when you line up those stats like that, my view on him has definitely changed.  Thanks for the link Dreamweapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317056</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317056</guid>
		<description>Or Quinn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or Quinn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317055</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317055</guid>
		<description>Although I will say I&#039;m not big on D. Anderson at all. Not even a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I will say I&#8217;m not big on D. Anderson at all. Not even a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317054</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317054</guid>
		<description>I can appreciate the notion calling any player who&#039;s been in the league just three years a potential HoFamer hyperbole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can appreciate the notion calling any player who&#8217;s been in the league just three years a potential HoFamer hyperbole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317052</guid>
		<description>My point is the NFL HOF is the NFL HOF. Elway wasn&#039;t cosidered a potential HOFer after all he did until he won a Super Bowl. Big Ben is a potential HOFer because he won 2 Super Bowls and he might not make make the HOF when all is said and done.

Kurt Warner was bagging groceries until the age 27 (I exaggettae the tale) and now is a &quot;potential&quot; HOFer after 2 MVPs, 3 SB appearances and one SB victory. 

Potential. And people argue that to no end.

Cutler is good, but potentila HOFer is crazy hyperbole. Just surprised me is all. 

And I have to say Anderson &amp; Rogers is a lot for Cutler. I&#039;d give Anderson and a 2 or a 3. That&#039;s it.

Talk to me in five to ten years, let&#039;s see what the Cutler kid has done by then. Until then, he is as much a potential bust as he is a potential HOFer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is the NFL HOF is the NFL HOF. Elway wasn&#8217;t cosidered a potential HOFer after all he did until he won a Super Bowl. Big Ben is a potential HOFer because he won 2 Super Bowls and he might not make make the HOF when all is said and done.</p>
<p>Kurt Warner was bagging groceries until the age 27 (I exaggettae the tale) and now is a &#8220;potential&#8221; HOFer after 2 MVPs, 3 SB appearances and one SB victory. </p>
<p>Potential. And people argue that to no end.</p>
<p>Cutler is good, but potentila HOFer is crazy hyperbole. Just surprised me is all. </p>
<p>And I have to say Anderson &amp; Rogers is a lot for Cutler. I&#8217;d give Anderson and a 2 or a 3. That&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Talk to me in five to ten years, let&#8217;s see what the Cutler kid has done by then. Until then, he is as much a potential bust as he is a potential HOFer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317051</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317051</guid>
		<description>I agree the injury replacement totally defeats the spirit of the wager. That&#039;s why I&#039;m not including it. Just saying it&#039;s another factor to consider outside the bet - in regards to my original point. 

Well said about Cutler. Ryan is a definite option, although it will be interesting to see how he reacts once more game film is on him. Romo and Rivers too - but they are older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the injury replacement totally defeats the spirit of the wager. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m not including it. Just saying it&#8217;s another factor to consider outside the bet &#8211; in regards to my original point. </p>
<p>Well said about Cutler. Ryan is a definite option, although it will be interesting to see how he reacts once more game film is on him. Romo and Rivers too &#8211; but they are older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317050</guid>
		<description>No, I wasn&#039;t suggesting as much, like I said he&#039;s been reasonably healthy, and even when he misses games he still generally has very productive years.

I understand the argument as far as &quot;plus replacement player&quot;.  It&#039;s smart for building a team (e.g. better to have 4 mos. of Wieters and 2 of, say, AJ Pierzynski than 6 mos. of Posada) but I can&#039;t see it working for bets as to individual player performance.  How long does an injury have to be before the fill-in guy&#039;s stats counted?  Is a DL stint required?  Who was the replacement player?  What sort of league would this theoretic replacement guy be in?  A 10-team league with 3 OF positions?  A 14-team with 5?  What is the standard?  Would you simply be playing &quot;my OF1 position, assuming Beltran is the top option, vs. yours, assuming Holliday is the lead&quot;?  It just doesn&#039;t seem workable, and kind of defeats the spirit of the wager. 

Anyway, on another subject Cutler is a great young QB and I think it&#039;s far more acceptable to project him as a future HoFer than it is to project Brady Quinn as being some kind of franchise cornerstone, as the paper apparently suggested.  Several QBs from every generation make the Hall.  It&#039;s just the way it is, it&#039;s the highest profile position and is accorded a disproportionate amount of attention.  Dawson, Griese, Jurgensen, Namath, Starr, Staubach, Tarkenton and Unitas were all in the league together at the same time, they&#039;re all in.  Marino, Montana, Moon, Young, Elway, Aikman and Kelly are all in together.  Favre&#039;s on the way.  Aikman and Kelly?  Cutler&#039;s probably already a better pro QB than either of those guys ever were.  Both were system products who benefited greatly from awesome teammates.  The signature Bills&#039; QB performance of the Kelly era was put up by Frank freakin&#039; Reich.  Christ, Aikman debuted at 1-15.  Cutler&#039;s resume so far is looking just fine by comparison.  Inevitably, several guys now playing are going to make it, and it&#039;s going to have to be more than just Brady and Manning (and possibly Brees).  Don&#039;t see anyone from the 25-and-under class with a better shot than Cutler, provided he keeps on his current trajectory, unless it&#039;s possibly Ryan, whose track record makes Cutler&#039;s look monumental.   There&#039;ll be others, who knows who, but I really doubt one of them is Quinn, which is kind of the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I wasn&#8217;t suggesting as much, like I said he&#8217;s been reasonably healthy, and even when he misses games he still generally has very productive years.</p>
<p>I understand the argument as far as &#8220;plus replacement player&#8221;.  It&#8217;s smart for building a team (e.g. better to have 4 mos. of Wieters and 2 of, say, AJ Pierzynski than 6 mos. of Posada) but I can&#8217;t see it working for bets as to individual player performance.  How long does an injury have to be before the fill-in guy&#8217;s stats counted?  Is a DL stint required?  Who was the replacement player?  What sort of league would this theoretic replacement guy be in?  A 10-team league with 3 OF positions?  A 14-team with 5?  What is the standard?  Would you simply be playing &#8220;my OF1 position, assuming Beltran is the top option, vs. yours, assuming Holliday is the lead&#8221;?  It just doesn&#8217;t seem workable, and kind of defeats the spirit of the wager. </p>
<p>Anyway, on another subject Cutler is a great young QB and I think it&#8217;s far more acceptable to project him as a future HoFer than it is to project Brady Quinn as being some kind of franchise cornerstone, as the paper apparently suggested.  Several QBs from every generation make the Hall.  It&#8217;s just the way it is, it&#8217;s the highest profile position and is accorded a disproportionate amount of attention.  Dawson, Griese, Jurgensen, Namath, Starr, Staubach, Tarkenton and Unitas were all in the league together at the same time, they&#8217;re all in.  Marino, Montana, Moon, Young, Elway, Aikman and Kelly are all in together.  Favre&#8217;s on the way.  Aikman and Kelly?  Cutler&#8217;s probably already a better pro QB than either of those guys ever were.  Both were system products who benefited greatly from awesome teammates.  The signature Bills&#8217; QB performance of the Kelly era was put up by Frank freakin&#8217; Reich.  Christ, Aikman debuted at 1-15.  Cutler&#8217;s resume so far is looking just fine by comparison.  Inevitably, several guys now playing are going to make it, and it&#8217;s going to have to be more than just Brady and Manning (and possibly Brees).  Don&#8217;t see anyone from the 25-and-under class with a better shot than Cutler, provided he keeps on his current trajectory, unless it&#8217;s possibly Ryan, whose track record makes Cutler&#8217;s look monumental.   There&#8217;ll be others, who knows who, but I really doubt one of them is Quinn, which is kind of the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317047</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317047</guid>
		<description>Dreamweapon - Staying healthy is a skill. No doubt. But Beltran isn&#039;t in the Kendrick area of injury-proneness. And my point was this - if 20 fewer games of Beltran + a league average replacement player outperforms Holliday, then Beltran is more valuable and should be drafted higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweapon &#8211; Staying healthy is a skill. No doubt. But Beltran isn&#8217;t in the Kendrick area of injury-proneness. And my point was this &#8211; if 20 fewer games of Beltran + a league average replacement player outperforms Holliday, then Beltran is more valuable and should be drafted higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317046</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317046</guid>
		<description>Tyler Durden - Who cares what Cutler&#039;s record is. He plays in the NFL. Not the NBA.
Joe Montana&#039;s first 33 starts: 52:32 TD:INT ratio, 7.1 YPA, 61 sacks.

Cutler&#039;s first 37 starts: 54:37 TD:INT ratio, 7.4 YPA, 51 sacks.

Cutler has also ran for more than 100 more yards and fumbled three fewer times.

Montana was just the first person I looked up - I&#039;m too lazy to do more, and he&#039;s widely considered one of the best QBs (if not the best) ever so I just wanted to compare them at similar stages of their careers.

Obviously, Cutler may not make the Hall of Fame, but he&#039;s clearly had one of the most impressive starts to a career ever. No, I was not joking. In fact, I stand by that comment more than any I made in this article. The Cleveland Plain Dealer&#039;s comment was an absolute joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler Durden &#8211; Who cares what Cutler&#8217;s record is. He plays in the NFL. Not the NBA.<br />
Joe Montana&#8217;s first 33 starts: 52:32 TD:INT ratio, 7.1 YPA, 61 sacks.</p>
<p>Cutler&#8217;s first 37 starts: 54:37 TD:INT ratio, 7.4 YPA, 51 sacks.</p>
<p>Cutler has also ran for more than 100 more yards and fumbled three fewer times.</p>
<p>Montana was just the first person I looked up &#8211; I&#8217;m too lazy to do more, and he&#8217;s widely considered one of the best QBs (if not the best) ever so I just wanted to compare them at similar stages of their careers.</p>
<p>Obviously, Cutler may not make the Hall of Fame, but he&#8217;s clearly had one of the most impressive starts to a career ever. No, I was not joking. In fact, I stand by that comment more than any I made in this article. The Cleveland Plain Dealer&#8217;s comment was an absolute joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jewru</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317045</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jewru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317045</guid>
		<description>Weapon I will bet you $100 that Beltran is the superior fantasy option to Holliday this year.   We can leave it to Dalton to make the determination.  
I typed this before I saw that DDD made the same offer.  Dream you are nuts. BELTRAN RULES.  LETS GO METS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weapon I will bet you $100 that Beltran is the superior fantasy option to Holliday this year.   We can leave it to Dalton to make the determination.<br />
I typed this before I saw that DDD made the same offer.  Dream you are nuts. BELTRAN RULES.  LETS GO METS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317044</guid>
		<description>Well, they say staying healthy is a skill, right?  Otherwise Howie Kendrick would be a meaningful FBL asset, possibly a top-5 2B, rather than a ready-made joke.  Beltran&#039;s been solid though, he&#039;s a good player and did play a full sked last year.  Even when he misses 20 he still performs at a high level (except for &#039;05).  It&#039;ll be close, I can&#039;t see one of them running away from the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they say staying healthy is a skill, right?  Otherwise Howie Kendrick would be a meaningful FBL asset, possibly a top-5 2B, rather than a ready-made joke.  Beltran&#8217;s been solid though, he&#8217;s a good player and did play a full sked last year.  Even when he misses 20 he still performs at a high level (except for &#8216;05).  It&#8217;ll be close, I can&#8217;t see one of them running away from the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TylerDurden</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317043</link>
		<dc:creator>TylerDurden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317043</guid>
		<description>Unintentionally funniest think you have ever written: &quot;one’s a potential Hall of Famer&quot;

Never thought that before, which says a lot as I have been reading this column for a long, long time, but no 25-year old kid with a 37-37 record after 3 NFL seasons that has never played a playof game is &#039;a potential HOFer.&#039; 

Were you joking? Please tell me you were. Make fun of the Cleveland Plain Dealer all you want, but, dude, you are bette than this.

Just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unintentionally funniest think you have ever written: &#8220;one’s a potential Hall of Famer&#8221;</p>
<p>Never thought that before, which says a lot as I have been reading this column for a long, long time, but no 25-year old kid with a 37-37 record after 3 NFL seasons that has never played a playof game is &#8216;a potential HOFer.&#8217; </p>
<p>Were you joking? Please tell me you were. Make fun of the Cleveland Plain Dealer all you want, but, dude, you are bette than this.</p>
<p>Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317042</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317042</guid>
		<description>I guess one aspect where I can still lose this bet yet also be right is if Beltran is def. better yet misses 20 games. In fantasy, if you add the replacement level player, I&#039;d still be right Beltran was more valuable, yet I&#039;d lose the bet. Oh well, I accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess one aspect where I can still lose this bet yet also be right is if Beltran is def. better yet misses 20 games. In fantasy, if you add the replacement level player, I&#8217;d still be right Beltran was more valuable, yet I&#8217;d lose the bet. Oh well, I accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317041</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317041</guid>
		<description>OK, sounds good!  Looks like I&#039;m gonna have to break out my Beltran voodoo doll early this season, hopefully we can get him down to 120 games or so and wrap this thing up before it gets started, hehehe. [g]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, sounds good!  Looks like I&#8217;m gonna have to break out my Beltran voodoo doll early this season, hopefully we can get him down to 120 games or so and wrap this thing up before it gets started, hehehe. [g]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2009/03/the-scoop-116/comment-page-1/#comment-317040</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2009/03/03/the-scoop-116/#comment-317040</guid>
		<description>Sounds good Dreamweapon. Consider it a bet. (I&#039;m not familiar with ESPN&#039;s player rater, but if you think it&#039;s legit, I&#039;m OK with that. Normally when I bet someone on &quot;who has the better fantasy season,&quot; we just judge at the end in a friendly manner. And if it&#039;s close and debatable, just call it a tie).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good Dreamweapon. Consider it a bet. (I&#8217;m not familiar with ESPN&#8217;s player rater, but if you think it&#8217;s legit, I&#8217;m OK with that. Normally when I bet someone on &#8220;who has the better fantasy season,&#8221; we just judge at the end in a friendly manner. And if it&#8217;s close and debatable, just call it a tie).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
