<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 16 Lineup Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-301309</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-301309</guid>
		<description>Oh, we run 2-week matchups in the playoffs (4 out of 14 teams go, semis are two weeks (14-15) and finals are two weeks (16-17)), so we&#039;re at the halfway point now.  I&#039;m up 94-82 against my buddy Niles&#039; heavily favored team (he was the regular season high scorer, I was the #4 seed), and feeling pretty damn good about my chances.  I have Brees and his assault on Marino vs. a disinterested Carolina team, Westbrook in a must-win for the Iggles, Schaub vs. whoever Schaub is playing, and can cobble together the rest.  I figure I&#039;ll be without Dallas Clark, which blows since he&#039;s been a beast for me the last couple of weeks, and I&#039;m definitely not counting on Boldin either, and am even planning on sitting Chris Johnson in favor of, haha, Benson, who I picked up like two or three months ago for precisely this reason (potential Wk17 duty), but Benson does play KC at home, and I can run Hixon again, and get some joker like Heap or Martin to get by.  My opponent has a suddenly sketchy Warner, a couple of likely-to-be-rested WRs (Wayne and Smith), a pair of badly nicked-up Cowboys (Barber and Witten), as well as Big Ben, who I could also see sitting.  Oh yeah, he has LenWhale too, which could possibly be a problem, but I&#039;m not too worried.  About the only guy he has who really worries me is Pierre Thomas, but I really think that&#039;s going to be Brees&#039; show on Sunday.

12 pts is hardly insurmountable, but with the way things are aligning, I&#039;m rather optimistic.  This would be a big deal for me, in addition to actually really needing the cash, I hadn&#039;t even made the playoffs the last couple of years and was beginning to despise FFL (at least vis-a-vis baseball), especially after absurdly falling short last season with the highest scoring team in league history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, we run 2-week matchups in the playoffs (4 out of 14 teams go, semis are two weeks (14-15) and finals are two weeks (16-17)), so we&#8217;re at the halfway point now.  I&#8217;m up 94-82 against my buddy Niles&#8217; heavily favored team (he was the regular season high scorer, I was the #4 seed), and feeling pretty damn good about my chances.  I have Brees and his assault on Marino vs. a disinterested Carolina team, Westbrook in a must-win for the Iggles, Schaub vs. whoever Schaub is playing, and can cobble together the rest.  I figure I&#8217;ll be without Dallas Clark, which blows since he&#8217;s been a beast for me the last couple of weeks, and I&#8217;m definitely not counting on Boldin either, and am even planning on sitting Chris Johnson in favor of, haha, Benson, who I picked up like two or three months ago for precisely this reason (potential Wk17 duty), but Benson does play KC at home, and I can run Hixon again, and get some joker like Heap or Martin to get by.  My opponent has a suddenly sketchy Warner, a couple of likely-to-be-rested WRs (Wayne and Smith), a pair of badly nicked-up Cowboys (Barber and Witten), as well as Big Ben, who I could also see sitting.  Oh yeah, he has LenWhale too, which could possibly be a problem, but I&#8217;m not too worried.  About the only guy he has who really worries me is Pierre Thomas, but I really think that&#8217;s going to be Brees&#8217; show on Sunday.</p>
<p>12 pts is hardly insurmountable, but with the way things are aligning, I&#8217;m rather optimistic.  This would be a big deal for me, in addition to actually really needing the cash, I hadn&#8217;t even made the playoffs the last couple of years and was beginning to despise FFL (at least vis-a-vis baseball), especially after absurdly falling short last season with the highest scoring team in league history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-301257</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-301257</guid>
		<description>Nat - What can you do? Football is easily the least fair of all the fantasy sports. Frustrating to say the least.

Just watched Slumdog last Friday - I&#039;ve been getting some negative feedback, and although the ending is silly, I actually really liked it. Def. need to see Milk and Nixon as well. Also, I&#039;m strangely really intrigued by Gran Torino. Can&#039;t wait to hear Clint grunt all his lines. I heard Seven Pounds is the worst movie of the year, for whatever that&#039;s worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nat &#8211; What can you do? Football is easily the least fair of all the fantasy sports. Frustrating to say the least.</p>
<p>Just watched Slumdog last Friday &#8211; I&#8217;ve been getting some negative feedback, and although the ending is silly, I actually really liked it. Def. need to see Milk and Nixon as well. Also, I&#8217;m strangely really intrigued by Gran Torino. Can&#8217;t wait to hear Clint grunt all his lines. I heard Seven Pounds is the worst movie of the year, for whatever that&#8217;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-301256</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 07:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-301256</guid>
		<description>Dreamweapon - How&#039;d it all end up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweapon &#8211; How&#8217;d it all end up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-301140</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-301140</guid>
		<description>Well, in no small way did this blog get me back to the finals. But despite putting up 120 points this past weekend, I got steamrolled by a team with MJD, Rivers, Deangelo, Colston, and Gonzalez. Oh and Forte tonight. What a beat down.

Movies to see: Slumdog Millionaire, Milk, Frost/Nixon. I can&#039;t figure out if I&#039;m intrigued by Seven Pounds or just don&#039;t care. I&#039;m sure there&#039;s more - I just haven&#039;t been too enthused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in no small way did this blog get me back to the finals. But despite putting up 120 points this past weekend, I got steamrolled by a team with MJD, Rivers, Deangelo, Colston, and Gonzalez. Oh and Forte tonight. What a beat down.</p>
<p>Movies to see: Slumdog Millionaire, Milk, Frost/Nixon. I can&#8217;t figure out if I&#8217;m intrigued by Seven Pounds or just don&#8217;t care. I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s more &#8211; I just haven&#8217;t been too enthused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-301013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-301013</guid>
		<description>I went with Hixon, and just a few minutes in, I&#039;m ecstatic--thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went with Hixon, and just a few minutes in, I&#8217;m ecstatic&#8211;thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-300015</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-300015</guid>
		<description>Patrick - Obviously my ranking shows Cutler, but to get more in depth, none are obviously bad choices. While I consider Rivers a legit MVP candidate who&#039;s had a fantastic year, his matchup worries me the most. So this comes down to the other 3 to me, and all are close enough for me to say go with your own gut. I like Thigpen&#039;s ability to run, but his passing yards (and YPA) have def. lacked. Still, at home and against a beatable (although improved) Mia secondary, he&#039;s a solid option. 

Schaub is the man - I&#039;ve been an apologist all year. My one worry is Slaton going nuts. Whereas Denver will throw more, and has a slightly better (on paper) matchup. Though the weather in Denver is in question. I say Cutler is due for a rebound and has the best matchup, but this isn&#039;t a no-brainer.

Your RBs I ranked 6-8 - doesn&#039;t get more close than that.

Same with Bowe and R. Moss (9, 10). Comes down to personal prefernece. Any added suggestions are welcome from the crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8211; Obviously my ranking shows Cutler, but to get more in depth, none are obviously bad choices. While I consider Rivers a legit MVP candidate who&#8217;s had a fantastic year, his matchup worries me the most. So this comes down to the other 3 to me, and all are close enough for me to say go with your own gut. I like Thigpen&#8217;s ability to run, but his passing yards (and YPA) have def. lacked. Still, at home and against a beatable (although improved) Mia secondary, he&#8217;s a solid option. </p>
<p>Schaub is the man &#8211; I&#8217;ve been an apologist all year. My one worry is Slaton going nuts. Whereas Denver will throw more, and has a slightly better (on paper) matchup. Though the weather in Denver is in question. I say Cutler is due for a rebound and has the best matchup, but this isn&#8217;t a no-brainer.</p>
<p>Your RBs I ranked 6-8 &#8211; doesn&#8217;t get more close than that.</p>
<p>Same with Bowe and R. Moss (9, 10). Comes down to personal prefernece. Any added suggestions are welcome from the crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-299908</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-299908</guid>
		<description>ok. i&#039;m in the championship game. who do you think i should start at qb out of thigpen, schaub, cutler and rivers. i am thinking of going with thigpen with schaub a second choice. what do you all think? i can only play 1 of them.
also, at running back, who should i start out of steve jackson, matt forte, kevin smith, and tashard choice. i have 2 spots for that.
one more...at receiver, should i go with moss or bowe for the third spot along with andre johnson and marshall?
thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok. i&#8217;m in the championship game. who do you think i should start at qb out of thigpen, schaub, cutler and rivers. i am thinking of going with thigpen with schaub a second choice. what do you all think? i can only play 1 of them.<br />
also, at running back, who should i start out of steve jackson, matt forte, kevin smith, and tashard choice. i have 2 spots for that.<br />
one more&#8230;at receiver, should i go with moss or bowe for the third spot along with andre johnson and marshall?<br />
thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-299677</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-299677</guid>
		<description>For me, it&#039;s easily Hixon. Over the last four weeks his targets have been 8,9,9,11.

Although weather is a factor there too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s easily Hixon. Over the last four weeks his targets have been 8,9,9,11.</p>
<p>Although weather is a factor there too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-299673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-299673</guid>
		<description>Yeah, speaking of that particular game, I&#039;ve got a red-alert situation of my own with Boldin.  I have Breaston as well so I could just wait until gametime, but currently have ZERO other WR alternatives besides those two to run alongside Bowe this week, so I may be looking at a gaping hole in my lineup.  Fortunately my opponent has Warner, so it won&#039;t be a total loss overall.....but I&#039;m thinking I need to get another option onto my bench in case it looks like a complete whiteout at noon.  

Here are my crappy FA options:
-Hixon (Questionable, Giants&#039; game weather apparently bad as well)
-Avant (ick)
-Somebody named Johnnie Lee Higgins (who?)
-Stokley
-Jenkins
-Some crappy monosyllabic Vikes wideout (Wade, Rice)
-Bradley (terrifying)
-Any non-Evans Bills receiver (Reed, Parrish)

If any of these guys manage to top 5 points it&#039;ll be a friggin&#039; miracle, but that&#039;s where I am....I just have no idea which pipe dream to run with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, speaking of that particular game, I&#8217;ve got a red-alert situation of my own with Boldin.  I have Breaston as well so I could just wait until gametime, but currently have ZERO other WR alternatives besides those two to run alongside Bowe this week, so I may be looking at a gaping hole in my lineup.  Fortunately my opponent has Warner, so it won&#8217;t be a total loss overall&#8230;..but I&#8217;m thinking I need to get another option onto my bench in case it looks like a complete whiteout at noon.  </p>
<p>Here are my crappy FA options:<br />
-Hixon (Questionable, Giants&#8217; game weather apparently bad as well)<br />
-Avant (ick)<br />
-Somebody named Johnnie Lee Higgins (who?)<br />
-Stokley<br />
-Jenkins<br />
-Some crappy monosyllabic Vikes wideout (Wade, Rice)<br />
-Bradley (terrifying)<br />
-Any non-Evans Bills receiver (Reed, Parrish)</p>
<p>If any of these guys manage to top 5 points it&#8217;ll be a friggin&#8217; miracle, but that&#8217;s where I am&#8230;.I just have no idea which pipe dream to run with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-299660</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-299660</guid>
		<description>Not nuts at all. In fact, that&#039;s the safer move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not nuts at all. In fact, that&#8217;s the safer move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/comment-page-1/#comment-299649</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/18/week-16-lineup-rankings-3/#comment-299649</guid>
		<description>Am I nuts to consider Shaun Hill over Warner? I&#039;m very worried about Warner this week, in the snow with those gloves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I nuts to consider Shaun Hill over Warner? I&#8217;m very worried about Warner this week, in the snow with those gloves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
