<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jdb</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297863</link>
		<dc:creator>jdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297863</guid>
		<description>Oops. You&#039;re right, Dalton. Re-ran the numbers and Atlanta&#039;s over 8 YPA passing; Jax was right below them on the spreadsheet and I think I grabbed their YPA. And the 6 sacks were against TB on MNF; typo. Insert red face smiley here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. You&#8217;re right, Dalton. Re-ran the numbers and Atlanta&#8217;s over 8 YPA passing; Jax was right below them on the spreadsheet and I think I grabbed their YPA. And the 6 sacks were against TB on MNF; typo. Insert red face smiley here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297599</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297599</guid>
		<description>jdb - Good stuff. I think your numbers are little off regarding the pass D (Atlanta has a much higher YPA than that and was only sacked once the last time they faced Carolina), but I get your point in general.

And the Delhomme comparison to Favre is apt. He does have that gunslinger mentality and has played well in the postseason. I have very fond memories of that magical season Moose had - he carried me to a championship. Watched him personally in SF haul in 3 TDs. He was the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jdb &#8211; Good stuff. I think your numbers are little off regarding the pass D (Atlanta has a much higher YPA than that and was only sacked once the last time they faced Carolina), but I get your point in general.</p>
<p>And the Delhomme comparison to Favre is apt. He does have that gunslinger mentality and has played well in the postseason. I have very fond memories of that magical season Moose had &#8211; he carried me to a championship. Watched him personally in SF haul in 3 TDs. He was the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdb</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297528</link>
		<dc:creator>jdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297528</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply, Dalton. I&#039;m a little bit of a Panthers fan. Happens when you live in Charlotte.

They&#039;ve regressed some over the past 6 weeks in pass D. Leaving out Detroit and Oakland (not exactly tests of a team&#039;s pass D), they gave up 7.1 YPA to Arizona (season average 6.7), 9.3 YPA to Atlanta (6.5 season average), 6.2 YPA to GB (vs. 6.4), and 6.9YPA (vs. 5.9) against the Bucs. In addition, in those four games, the QBs are averaging a little over 65% completions. Only 2 INTs across that span as well; while they had 9 sacks in those 4 games, 6 of those were against Atlanta. Pretty much what you&#039;d expect from a soft, &quot;don&#039;t lose the game&quot; zone with little blitzing.

Delhomme&#039;s very mistake prone - but that&#039;s nothing new. He always had 1-3 erratic games each season, but that hasn&#039;t stopped him from putting up extremely good postseason numbers in the past. He&#039;s really a poor man&#039;s Brett Favre: great when he&#039;s on, horrible when he&#039;s not, almost always on when it matters. 

Actually, Jake&#039;s numbers this season have been right at his career averages everywhere except TDs; having a decent run game for the first time since 2003 seems to me the most likely explanation for that change. Obviously, not comforting to his fantasy owners, but Panther fans don&#039;t mind that we have two RBs able to punch the ball in from 20 or 30 yards out.

And, yes, Smith obviously makes him better, but don&#039;t forget that when Smith missed almost the entire 2004 season, Delhomme had nearly his best season with only Muhammad as a target (that was the season Moose was statistically the best WR in the NFL). It&#039;s a mutual thing; would Smith be as good as he is if Delhomme didn&#039;t have the utter faith in him he does? And that&#039;s true of almost every QB; even Brady&#039;s numbers were just okay until he got Moss to throw to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, Dalton. I&#8217;m a little bit of a Panthers fan. Happens when you live in Charlotte.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve regressed some over the past 6 weeks in pass D. Leaving out Detroit and Oakland (not exactly tests of a team&#8217;s pass D), they gave up 7.1 YPA to Arizona (season average 6.7), 9.3 YPA to Atlanta (6.5 season average), 6.2 YPA to GB (vs. 6.4), and 6.9YPA (vs. 5.9) against the Bucs. In addition, in those four games, the QBs are averaging a little over 65% completions. Only 2 INTs across that span as well; while they had 9 sacks in those 4 games, 6 of those were against Atlanta. Pretty much what you&#8217;d expect from a soft, &#8220;don&#8217;t lose the game&#8221; zone with little blitzing.</p>
<p>Delhomme&#8217;s very mistake prone &#8211; but that&#8217;s nothing new. He always had 1-3 erratic games each season, but that hasn&#8217;t stopped him from putting up extremely good postseason numbers in the past. He&#8217;s really a poor man&#8217;s Brett Favre: great when he&#8217;s on, horrible when he&#8217;s not, almost always on when it matters. </p>
<p>Actually, Jake&#8217;s numbers this season have been right at his career averages everywhere except TDs; having a decent run game for the first time since 2003 seems to me the most likely explanation for that change. Obviously, not comforting to his fantasy owners, but Panther fans don&#8217;t mind that we have two RBs able to punch the ball in from 20 or 30 yards out.</p>
<p>And, yes, Smith obviously makes him better, but don&#8217;t forget that when Smith missed almost the entire 2004 season, Delhomme had nearly his best season with only Muhammad as a target (that was the season Moose was statistically the best WR in the NFL). It&#8217;s a mutual thing; would Smith be as good as he is if Delhomme didn&#8217;t have the utter faith in him he does? And that&#8217;s true of almost every QB; even Brady&#8217;s numbers were just okay until he got Moss to throw to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297450</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297450</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say start Hixon if he wasn&#039;t hurt. As is, that makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say start Hixon if he wasn&#8217;t hurt. As is, that makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297442</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297442</guid>
		<description>Driver and Hixon, might get Ocho Cinco tomorrow, dropping Hixon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Driver and Hixon, might get Ocho Cinco tomorrow, dropping Hixon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297427</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d give it an A, especially with MJD taking over full time duties. Your one area of weakness would be Holmes - no other options there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d give it an A, especially with MJD taking over full time duties. Your one area of weakness would be Holmes &#8211; no other options there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297421</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297421</guid>
		<description>Grade this lineup

QB- Warner
RB- MJD, C. Johnson (TEN)
WR- Fitz, Calvin, Holmes 
TE- Gates
K- Bryant
D- Steelers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grade this lineup</p>
<p>QB- Warner<br />
RB- MJD, C. Johnson (TEN)<br />
WR- Fitz, Calvin, Holmes<br />
TE- Gates<br />
K- Bryant<br />
D- Steelers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297416</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297416</guid>
		<description>Ya he&#039;s a solid start - I&#039;m using him as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya he&#8217;s a solid start &#8211; I&#8217;m using him as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297409</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297409</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, I think Im gonna go with Bryant, should work out beautifully</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, I think Im gonna go with Bryant, should work out beautifully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297390</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297390</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fool&#039;s errand trying to predict kicker output on a weekly basis. Go with a team you feel confident will score a lot and won&#039;t have to deal with bad weather, preferably a dome. Seriously, that&#039;s way too hard to predict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fool&#8217;s errand trying to predict kicker output on a weekly basis. Go with a team you feel confident will score a lot and won&#8217;t have to deal with bad weather, preferably a dome. Seriously, that&#8217;s way too hard to predict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297365</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297365</guid>
		<description>Actually I was more concerned with Kickers, as my TE (Gates) and D (Pitt) are pretty well set, at this point I feel my team is very strong, but what would u say are the top 10 Kickers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I was more concerned with Kickers, as my TE (Gates) and D (Pitt) are pretty well set, at this point I feel my team is very strong, but what would u say are the top 10 Kickers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297358</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297358</guid>
		<description>Stevie Ya Yo - But Gore getting hurt had nothing to do with what team he was on. Not that his injury risk wasn&#039;t another factor as well. I&#039;m bitter. 

That&#039;s not crazy at all keeping both Carolina backs. Also keep Fitz. Let Jacobs and his injuries go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stevie Ya Yo &#8211; But Gore getting hurt had nothing to do with what team he was on. Not that his injury risk wasn&#8217;t another factor as well. I&#8217;m bitter. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not crazy at all keeping both Carolina backs. Also keep Fitz. Let Jacobs and his injuries go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297357</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297357</guid>
		<description>Nat - Damn you for not trading me Rhodes! 

Portis, C. Johnson and Rhodes. Wow tough benching Slaton and D. Ward. Basically all are borderline top-10 starts. That&#039;s who I&#039;d go with tho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nat &#8211; Damn you for not trading me Rhodes! </p>
<p>Portis, C. Johnson and Rhodes. Wow tough benching Slaton and D. Ward. Basically all are borderline top-10 starts. That&#8217;s who I&#8217;d go with tho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevie Ya Yo</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297304</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevie Ya Yo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297304</guid>
		<description>I traded Gore specifically because I hate having the one good player on the bad NFL team at the tail end of a(nother) wasted season. I&#039;m still not quite sure what I accomplished in turning Gore, MarLynch and Cal Johnson into Purple Jesus and Andre Johnson, but it works within my philosophy, at least. 

How drunk am I to be considering keeping both Panther RBs in a league in which I can only keep three players!?!?!? (Only other real keeper candidates are L-Fitz, Cassel and Brandon Breakobs, er, Jacobs.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I traded Gore specifically because I hate having the one good player on the bad NFL team at the tail end of a(nother) wasted season. I&#8217;m still not quite sure what I accomplished in turning Gore, MarLynch and Cal Johnson into Purple Jesus and Andre Johnson, but it works within my philosophy, at least. </p>
<p>How drunk am I to be considering keeping both Panther RBs in a league in which I can only keep three players!?!?!? (Only other real keeper candidates are L-Fitz, Cassel and Brandon Breakobs, er, Jacobs.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297291</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297291</guid>
		<description>You offered me a great deal for Rhodes. I&#039;m just glad I didn&#039;t take it.

I have the same dilemma in my primary league: Cutler or Thigpen? I&#039;m thinking of doing eeny meeny or having my girlfriend choose. Cutler will have to throw a lot and Marshall looked sweeeet last week, but throwing into that D? Yuck. Gonzalez, Bradley and Bowe in the Chargers Secondary smells like Christmas dinner to me...

Choose 3 this week:  Portis, Chris Johnson, Slaton, Ward, Rhodes. Tatum Bell and Fargas are riding pine. I have so many RBs... ESPN projections would choose Ward, Johnson and Portis... but they also don&#039;t consider Addai being out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You offered me a great deal for Rhodes. I&#8217;m just glad I didn&#8217;t take it.</p>
<p>I have the same dilemma in my primary league: Cutler or Thigpen? I&#8217;m thinking of doing eeny meeny or having my girlfriend choose. Cutler will have to throw a lot and Marshall looked sweeeet last week, but throwing into that D? Yuck. Gonzalez, Bradley and Bowe in the Chargers Secondary smells like Christmas dinner to me&#8230;</p>
<p>Choose 3 this week:  Portis, Chris Johnson, Slaton, Ward, Rhodes. Tatum Bell and Fargas are riding pine. I have so many RBs&#8230; ESPN projections would choose Ward, Johnson and Portis&#8230; but they also don&#8217;t consider Addai being out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297211</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297211</guid>
		<description>And yes, NOT hypothetically speaking, I&#039;m screwed in the RotoScoop Invitational this week. What a joke. My team is good enough to earn a bye last week, and now I lose Gore (who I specifically traded for the playoffs) and Addai (and I offered great deals for Rhodes the last week of the season just for insurance). Congrats on your victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, NOT hypothetically speaking, I&#8217;m screwed in the RotoScoop Invitational this week. What a joke. My team is good enough to earn a bye last week, and now I lose Gore (who I specifically traded for the playoffs) and Addai (and I offered great deals for Rhodes the last week of the season just for insurance). Congrats on your victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297210</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297210</guid>
		<description>Dreamweapon - Hey, I never said Housh sucked, just that he was overvalued as a fantasy player entering the year. And after losing Palmer, I&#039;m highly impressed with what he&#039;s been able to do. I def. consider him skilled. Both he and Welker are the NFL&#039;s best &quot;possession&quot; receivers. 

If anyone has read any of my material over the past couple of years, it&#039;s that I hate aging running backs. I didn&#039;t want to put Westbrook #2, and in fact, I can almost guarantee you I won&#039;t draft him next year. Too injury prone. Approaching 30. Etc. That said, Alexander has 2,187 career carries. LT2 has 2,607. Westbrook has 1,206! That&#039;s a big, big difference. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;ll probably (like usual) back off and be scared off as well next year, but is there a clear #2 ahead of him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreamweapon &#8211; Hey, I never said Housh sucked, just that he was overvalued as a fantasy player entering the year. And after losing Palmer, I&#8217;m highly impressed with what he&#8217;s been able to do. I def. consider him skilled. Both he and Welker are the NFL&#8217;s best &#8220;possession&#8221; receivers. </p>
<p>If anyone has read any of my material over the past couple of years, it&#8217;s that I hate aging running backs. I didn&#8217;t want to put Westbrook #2, and in fact, I can almost guarantee you I won&#8217;t draft him next year. Too injury prone. Approaching 30. Etc. That said, Alexander has 2,187 career carries. LT2 has 2,607. Westbrook has 1,206! That&#8217;s a big, big difference. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;ll probably (like usual) back off and be scared off as well next year, but is there a clear #2 ahead of him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297208</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297208</guid>
		<description>RotoFever - Posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RotoFever &#8211; Posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297207</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297207</guid>
		<description>jdb - I&#039;m guessing you are a Panthers fan? Their overall pass D numbers are pretty damn impressive - 6.4 YPA, 13 passing scores allowed. But you could very well be right that they have regressed. John Fox is pretty good other than the playing time issues, right? I&#039;m actually a Jake Delhomme fan (and of course he&#039;s better than the team&#039;s other options), but 15 TDs paired with 14 turnovers is a real problem. He doesn&#039;t take many sacks, and his 7.4 YPA mark is pretty solid, so I&#039;m not saying he&#039;s some bum. In fact, he can be great at times, but he&#039;s pretty mistake prone, and Steve Smith makes him look a little better than he really is. Did the surgery affect him? Maybe. Of the other possible playoff teams, I&#039;d say Warner, Romo and Cutler are all very, very good, but your overall point is well taken; lots of question marks at QB. 

Regarding Turner - I hate how he doesn&#039;t catch any passes. That makes him WAY too dependent on schedule. That said, with Ryan, White and Baker, that offense should only get better for years to come. Huge TD potential. I agree there are question marks with Turner, but seriously, who would you feel more comfortable with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jdb &#8211; I&#8217;m guessing you are a Panthers fan? Their overall pass D numbers are pretty damn impressive &#8211; 6.4 YPA, 13 passing scores allowed. But you could very well be right that they have regressed. John Fox is pretty good other than the playing time issues, right? I&#8217;m actually a Jake Delhomme fan (and of course he&#8217;s better than the team&#8217;s other options), but 15 TDs paired with 14 turnovers is a real problem. He doesn&#8217;t take many sacks, and his 7.4 YPA mark is pretty solid, so I&#8217;m not saying he&#8217;s some bum. In fact, he can be great at times, but he&#8217;s pretty mistake prone, and Steve Smith makes him look a little better than he really is. Did the surgery affect him? Maybe. Of the other possible playoff teams, I&#8217;d say Warner, Romo and Cutler are all very, very good, but your overall point is well taken; lots of question marks at QB. </p>
<p>Regarding Turner &#8211; I hate how he doesn&#8217;t catch any passes. That makes him WAY too dependent on schedule. That said, with Ryan, White and Baker, that offense should only get better for years to come. Huge TD potential. I agree there are question marks with Turner, but seriously, who would you feel more comfortable with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2008/12/the-scoop-102/comment-page-1/#comment-297204</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2008/12/09/the-scoop-102/#comment-297204</guid>
		<description>Donald - That must have been a pretty epic Monday nighter for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald &#8211; That must have been a pretty epic Monday nighter for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
