The Scoop

By Dalton Del Don

There’s a consensus top-5 that’s already been formed this year, with only the exact order up for debate. Personally, I’d actually welcome the sixth or seventh pick, as I don’t see as big of a drop off from the big five to Marion Barber and Frank Gore as most. It doesn’t get quite as easy after that, however.

With a deep quarterback class and no clear-cut No. 1 TE in a group that’s also rich with sleepers late, taking only running backs and wide receivers over the first five rounds makes more sense than ever this year. The top-15 RBs and top-15 WRs are both extremely strong groups compared to year’s past.

The NFC West looks like one of the weakest divisions in years. This isn’t a race to see who’s the fastest, but rather, who’s the least slowest.

Don’t get me wrong, Julius Jones was nothing short of terrible last season and has a limited ceiling (doesn’t catch passes), but I see him as a very serviceable RB3 who might be a bit undervalued in 2008. Dallas was a potent offense, but run blocking wasn’t one of its strengths, so although Seattle’s offensive line is a unit in decline, that move is lateral at worst. The Seahawks gave him a contract fit for a starter, and although T.J. Duckett is also in town, Mike Holmgren hates using players in specified roles (at the goal line). For all his faults (no vision, can’t break tackles), Jones is OK in short-yardage work, so he could emerge as Seattle’s primary ballcarrier, including at the goal line. Playing in a defensively challenged division with an emerging defense and a lacking WR corps behind him, Jones is in a pretty good position in 2008.

If there’s one team most likely to disappoint this year, it’s the Browns. Playing with expectations for the first time in a long time, and often in front of the national spotlight, Cleveland still doesn’t have a defense. The team also has a pretty rough looking schedule, at least on paper. Braylon Edwards, Kellen Winslow and the O-line are all legit, but Derek Anderson’s huge second half slide last year better not carryover into this season.

Free Pierre Thomas! We’ve already seen what Reggie Bush can do as an every down back, and it isn’t pretty. Bush isn’t a completely worthless NFL player, but he’s clearly best suited in a situational role, as the next properly read hole he hits hard will be his first. Since Deuce McAllister is coming off two more knee surgeries (one of them microfracture), he’s unlikely the answer, so why not Thomas, who showed more during one Week 17 game last year than Bush has during his entire career? Overrating one game would be foolish, but Thomas impressed every time he stepped on the field last year, albeit in an extremely small sample size. Playing in a high-octane offense that has no chance to succeed unless they run the ball far more than they did last season, there’s big time upside here.

I see no reason why Matt Forte isn’t a top 20-25 fantasy back. There’s little to no competition in Chicago, the coaching staff loves him, and he’s a three-down back who’s a highly capable receiver and blocker. The Bears offense shouldn’t be all that good, but the defense could bounce back, and the team added Chris Williams in the draft to improve the offensive line. Did I mention Forte put up 2,403 yards with 23 TDs on a Tulane team that had defenses 100 percent focused on stopping him last year?

Can someone, anyone, please emerge from Houston’s backfield? The passing game should be tremendous, and Gary Kubiak’s system wasn’t too shabby for the ground game when he was in Denver. Unfortunately, no one currently stands out on its roster. Ahman Green’s carcass isn’t the answer. Chris Brown will probably have 1-2 big games before breaking a bone or ligament. Steve Slaton projects better as a change-of-pace type. My deep sleeper is Chris Taylor, but he’ll have to avoid getting cut first.

How the carries will be divvied out between Ronnie Brown and Ricky Williams should be one of the bigger stories heading into the season. On one hand, Brown was fantasy football’s best back before getting injured last year, and Williams is 31 years old and has played in just one game since 2005. On the other hand, Brown is coming off a serious knee injury, and Williams’ career mileage isn’t overly excessive because of his love for yoga and the devil’s lettuce. Bill Parcells is also a big believer in committees. Although Brown may not truly be 100 percent until 2009, he’s clearly the better back at this point, so it’s just a matter of how many touches Williams steals.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

7 responses to “The Scoop”

  1. Brett Avatar

    DDD,

    Forte should be a solid and undervalued RB this year. In a recent mock I made him my #2 RB in round 5.

    Going with the “take WR and RB for the first five rounds,” I did the same and landed by starting QB in round 8: Aaron Rodgers. I think he could be this year’s Derek Anderson.

    Thoughts on Jonathan Stewart and Kevin Smith?

  2. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    I’d be surprised if Forte can be had in 5th rounds come August.

    I def. like A. Rodgers as a sleeper. He just needs to stay healthy. Great WR group in GB. He actually throws a good deep ball.

    1)Stewart
    2)Forte
    3)K. Smith

    I like all three rookies quite a bit – I’ll feel better about Stewart when he practices on that toe, but he’s in a very good situation in CAR. He could score double-digit TDs right out of the gate. I like K. Smith’s path to touches, but he had 450 carries last year. 50 more than any college RB ever! That might mean a breakdown in 2008.

  3. The Jewru Avatar
    The Jewru

    If somehow McGahee goes down, don’t be surprised to see Ray Rice be this year’s top rookie. His balance is amazing, he can stay low, and is surprisingly powerful for his size. Cam Cameron = Running Back nirvana.

  4. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    I agree on all points Jewru. Ray Rice reminds me of MJD, and he’s a definite sleeper. Cam Cameron gets crazy RB results.

  5. Keith Avatar
    Keith

    D3, I’m mulling over a trade proposal that I’m stumped on in my keeper league. It’s 6×6 with walks for hitters and holds for pitchers. We keep 10 players/year (no salaries, no limits), and I’ve been offered Braun for Bruce and Marmol. I’m not really in the running this year (30 pts out of first, ouch!), so I’m primarily looking to next year. I wouldn’t keep Marmol, even though he has great value in this league, so it’s almost Braun for Bruce. That’s a clear win for this year, but Braun’s horrific walk rate really scares me. Bruce has almost as many walks this season in about 200 fewer AB’s, and he doesn’t walk much! Any thoughts?

    I’m not ready for football talk yet!

  6. RotoScoop Avatar
    RotoScoop

    Such a tough call. I really think in situations like this, and I’m not trying to absolve myself, you really do know more than me based on league specifics. Bruce is going to walk more. Braun has been better at stealing so far in the majors, and he’s a proven source too. That said, Bruce is no joke, and he offers similar speed/power potential, both play OF and he walks more, so in a 6X6 league, I’d say his upside is greater.

    My best advice is to go with your own gut.

  7. Keith Avatar
    Keith

    You’re allowed to absolve yourself! I just wanted a sanity check since my gut said to hold onto Bruce, even though Braun is generally ranked much higher. I’m just curious which one of them would be more likely to make a leap as far as plate discipline, and it seems like Bruce is off to a better start there, while Braun is already on a 40HR pace and running a fair amount. Man, I hate trades like this!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *