<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bet on It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kritter77</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-56499</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-56499</guid>
		<description>I kinda like H2H, I love being able to mess with my opponent, but I see where people get frustrated with it. It depends on if things are going good or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda like H2H, I love being able to mess with my opponent, but I see where people get frustrated with it. It depends on if things are going good or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter77</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-56498</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-56498</guid>
		<description>Yeah JaMarcus looked decent, was nice to see him, 11-4 this week on the picks, I wish I had money on these picks, I&#039;ve had a good year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah JaMarcus looked decent, was nice to see him, 11-4 this week on the picks, I wish I had money on these picks, I&#8217;ve had a good year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-55551</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-55551</guid>
		<description>Kritter - Congrats on Oaktown coming through. Russell looked pretty good in limited action too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kritter &#8211; Congrats on Oaktown coming through. Russell looked pretty good in limited action too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-55550</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 03:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-55550</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like you&#039;re inside my mind Dreamweapon. I&#039;ve been planning on writing an article regarding the utter ridiculousness of the H2H format, so keep your eyes peeled in the coming days...

After tonight, there&#039;s a good chance that I scored the second most points of the week in my 12-team league during three out of the past four weeks and lost every single time. Read that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like you&#8217;re inside my mind Dreamweapon. I&#8217;ve been planning on writing an article regarding the utter ridiculousness of the H2H format, so keep your eyes peeled in the coming days&#8230;</p>
<p>After tonight, there&#8217;s a good chance that I scored the second most points of the week in my 12-team league during three out of the past four weeks and lost every single time. Read that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter77</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-55497</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-55497</guid>
		<description>Meaning KRITTER&#039;S STRAIGHT PICKS of course not my horrid fantasy team...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meaning KRITTER&#8217;S STRAIGHT PICKS of course not my horrid fantasy team&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter77</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-55496</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-55496</guid>
		<description>10-4 going into tonight this week, great to see my Raiders playing well, and yes, DONKEYS DOWN!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-4 going into tonight this week, great to see my Raiders playing well, and yes, DONKEYS DOWN!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamweapon</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/11/bet-on-it-12/comment-page-1/#comment-55487</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamweapon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/11/30/bet-on-it-12/#comment-55487</guid>
		<description>Triple-D, what do you think about a column addressing the inherent shortcomings of the H2H format? 

I know you got screwed this year yourself, but the tribulations of my main team are the stuff of legend, I kid you not.  I had Tomlinson (R1), Peterson (5), Roethlisberger (7) and a ton of other pieces I traded for during the season, including Braylon, Gates.....even Ryan Grant.  In our format, exactly three teams averaged 100 ppg this season.  Most were at 90 or less.

I scored below 90 points exactly once in 13 weeks.  Once.  I scored over 1420 on the season, shattering our league&#039;s single-season scoring record by nearly 100 points (this goes back three years).  In short, I had a wonderful campaign, the finest season ever turned in by a club in our format.

I also went 7-6 and missed the playoffs by 1/2 game (to a team which will not crack 1100 on the season), due to fluke occurrences, such as, say, Favre hitting Jennings on a 80-something yard bomb in OVERTIME ON THE MONDAY NIGHT GAME to bring my opponent back from a 17-pt loss to a 2-pt win, or losing to the worst team in the league (the only autodrafted one) when they had a miraculous 120 point day, by far their best of the season (I had like 115, 2nd most in the league that week).  I LOST more games in which I scored over 100 points than 3/4s of the teams managed to pass that mark, W or L.  

That was nothing but luck.  I struggle to think of analogies, but maybe this is like an MIT grad losing out on a nice job to a newly-minted DeVry grad.  Or maybe a Ferrari losing a race to a Fiat, because a friggin&#039; meteor fell out of the heavens and hit the Ferrari mid-race.  FFL is supposed to be a &quot;tournament of skill&quot;, which is the whole reason we can put money on it and escape the prohibition on gambling.  I am now convinced that H2H format in football is nothing but gambling, that there is very little skill involved at all.  At least with baseball and basketball there is a tendency towards the norm; that&#039;s not present in football b/c of the tiny slate of games.

I missed the playoffs last year (again, by a 1/2 game) despite having the 3rd most points in the league, but that was no biggie to me, it still seemed fair.  This year was so much worse.  I don&#039;t know what your thoughts are on the subject, but I have proposed to my league (and they have accepted) that next year&#039;s pot will be split, with halfish going to the playoff winners, and the other halfish (there are small weekly payouts for the high scorer as well) going to the 1-2-3 finishers on points over the entire 17-week season on a roughly similar split. 

This might not be perfect, but at least it eliminates the apparent problem of superpower teams getting jack squat b/c of totally arbitrary scheduling.  I&#039;m just curious to hear your thoughts on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Triple-D, what do you think about a column addressing the inherent shortcomings of the H2H format? </p>
<p>I know you got screwed this year yourself, but the tribulations of my main team are the stuff of legend, I kid you not.  I had Tomlinson (R1), Peterson (5), Roethlisberger (7) and a ton of other pieces I traded for during the season, including Braylon, Gates&#8230;..even Ryan Grant.  In our format, exactly three teams averaged 100 ppg this season.  Most were at 90 or less.</p>
<p>I scored below 90 points exactly once in 13 weeks.  Once.  I scored over 1420 on the season, shattering our league&#8217;s single-season scoring record by nearly 100 points (this goes back three years).  In short, I had a wonderful campaign, the finest season ever turned in by a club in our format.</p>
<p>I also went 7-6 and missed the playoffs by 1/2 game (to a team which will not crack 1100 on the season), due to fluke occurrences, such as, say, Favre hitting Jennings on a 80-something yard bomb in OVERTIME ON THE MONDAY NIGHT GAME to bring my opponent back from a 17-pt loss to a 2-pt win, or losing to the worst team in the league (the only autodrafted one) when they had a miraculous 120 point day, by far their best of the season (I had like 115, 2nd most in the league that week).  I LOST more games in which I scored over 100 points than 3/4s of the teams managed to pass that mark, W or L.  </p>
<p>That was nothing but luck.  I struggle to think of analogies, but maybe this is like an MIT grad losing out on a nice job to a newly-minted DeVry grad.  Or maybe a Ferrari losing a race to a Fiat, because a friggin&#8217; meteor fell out of the heavens and hit the Ferrari mid-race.  FFL is supposed to be a &#8220;tournament of skill&#8221;, which is the whole reason we can put money on it and escape the prohibition on gambling.  I am now convinced that H2H format in football is nothing but gambling, that there is very little skill involved at all.  At least with baseball and basketball there is a tendency towards the norm; that&#8217;s not present in football b/c of the tiny slate of games.</p>
<p>I missed the playoffs last year (again, by a 1/2 game) despite having the 3rd most points in the league, but that was no biggie to me, it still seemed fair.  This year was so much worse.  I don&#8217;t know what your thoughts are on the subject, but I have proposed to my league (and they have accepted) that next year&#8217;s pot will be split, with halfish going to the playoff winners, and the other halfish (there are small weekly payouts for the high scorer as well) going to the 1-2-3 finishers on points over the entire 17-week season on a roughly similar split. </p>
<p>This might not be perfect, but at least it eliminates the apparent problem of superpower teams getting jack squat b/c of totally arbitrary scheduling.  I&#8217;m just curious to hear your thoughts on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
