<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Scoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Tintle</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11661</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Tintle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11661</guid>
		<description>Curry balls, sire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curry balls, sire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11636</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11636</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not big on the Raiders offense at all, but Curry did have 33 catches over the final 4 games last year, which would be huge in a PPR league. That said,  Jennings would look awful good if Donald Driver&#039;s injury turns out to be serious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not big on the Raiders offense at all, but Curry did have 33 catches over the final 4 games last year, which would be huge in a PPR league. That said,  Jennings would look awful good if Donald Driver&#8217;s injury turns out to be serious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvac</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11595</link>
		<dc:creator>tvac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11595</guid>
		<description>I love your draft until you reached (at least imo) on Young and then picked Jackson over Chambers and Cooley over Shockey.  I like Roethlisberger where you got him.  I think you will be starting him by the middle of the year over Young.  I don&#039;t like the Curry pick but I understand it.  I would have grabbed Jennings over him but that is more of a personal choice I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your draft until you reached (at least imo) on Young and then picked Jackson over Chambers and Cooley over Shockey.  I like Roethlisberger where you got him.  I think you will be starting him by the middle of the year over Young.  I don&#8217;t like the Curry pick but I understand it.  I would have grabbed Jennings over him but that is more of a personal choice I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>Oh, and it&#039;s a 3WR/2RB league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s a 3WR/2RB league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11512</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11512</guid>
		<description>How did I do?

http://football31.myfantasyleague.com/2007/options?L=14730&amp;O=17</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did I do?</p>
<p><a href="http://football31.myfantasyleague.com/2007/options?L=14730&#038;O=17" rel="nofollow">http://football31.myfantasyleague.com/2007/options?L=14730&#038;O=17</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11509</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11509</guid>
		<description>Keith - Evans is tougher than most give him credit for. He caught 60 percent of the targets thrown his way last year, whereas other &quot;speedsters&quot; like Plaxico Burress (52%), Torry Holt (52%) and Terrell Owens (55%) weren&#039;t nearly as efficient. I personally love guys without decent secondary receivers, as I value the extra targets over speculated additional coverage. I also do anticipate an improved ground game, and they did address the O-line through free agency. I think he&#039;s worth a third round pick.

It&#039;s true Jacobs and Peterson haven&#039;t caught balls in the past, but I think both have the skills to move into the 30-45 catch range this season. It is a concern tho, that&#039;s for sure. Obviously, Reggie Bush moves way up in a PPR format - all the way to the No. 5/6 area, along with Westbrook of course. Funny you ask about MJD, as I was in this &quot;experts&quot; league yesterday and took him with the No. 9 overall pick in a PPR format. See, I actually back up my talk sometimes. Then, a guy I had no intention of drafting in any league this year fell to me with the No. 16th pick, Rudi Johnson. He obviously loses value in a PPR, but still, that&#039;s pretty late, even for me...Marshawn Lynch can be moved up a bit in PPR leagues as well.

More power to you if you can nab Henry in the 2nd and MJD/Jacobs in the third. I have seen MJD and Jacobs slip, so it is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith &#8211; Evans is tougher than most give him credit for. He caught 60 percent of the targets thrown his way last year, whereas other &#8220;speedsters&#8221; like Plaxico Burress (52%), Torry Holt (52%) and Terrell Owens (55%) weren&#8217;t nearly as efficient. I personally love guys without decent secondary receivers, as I value the extra targets over speculated additional coverage. I also do anticipate an improved ground game, and they did address the O-line through free agency. I think he&#8217;s worth a third round pick.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true Jacobs and Peterson haven&#8217;t caught balls in the past, but I think both have the skills to move into the 30-45 catch range this season. It is a concern tho, that&#8217;s for sure. Obviously, Reggie Bush moves way up in a PPR format &#8211; all the way to the No. 5/6 area, along with Westbrook of course. Funny you ask about MJD, as I was in this &#8220;experts&#8221; league yesterday and took him with the No. 9 overall pick in a PPR format. See, I actually back up my talk sometimes. Then, a guy I had no intention of drafting in any league this year fell to me with the No. 16th pick, Rudi Johnson. He obviously loses value in a PPR, but still, that&#8217;s pretty late, even for me&#8230;Marshawn Lynch can be moved up a bit in PPR leagues as well.</p>
<p>More power to you if you can nab Henry in the 2nd and MJD/Jacobs in the third. I have seen MJD and Jacobs slip, so it is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11508</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11508</guid>
		<description>Kritter - Kendall was a real solid addition, helping an already stout run blocking unit. Beasley was good back in the day on the 9ers, but I&#039;m not sure how much he has left in the tank. The Washington ground game should be productive, but Betts and Portis may cut into each other&#039;s fantasy value a little more than most owners will like, especially those spending an early pick on CP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kritter &#8211; Kendall was a real solid addition, helping an already stout run blocking unit. Beasley was good back in the day on the 9ers, but I&#8217;m not sure how much he has left in the tank. The Washington ground game should be productive, but Betts and Portis may cut into each other&#8217;s fantasy value a little more than most owners will like, especially those spending an early pick on CP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11497</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11497</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll have the guts to take Henry in the 1st, but I&#039;d gladly take him in the 2nd, with either MJD or Jacobs in the 3rd...a guy can dream, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll have the guts to take Henry in the 1st, but I&#8217;d gladly take him in the 2nd, with either MJD or Jacobs in the 3rd&#8230;a guy can dream, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11496</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 05:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11496</guid>
		<description>Evans worries me, since he&#039;s kind of long-pass dependent, but he&#039;s about as good as there is in that department. I know he&#039;s got the talent, but I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll sneak up on people this season. Without a 2nd receiver, and unless they get the run game going, it just seems like it&#039;d be very easy to keep a safety on him.

Jacobs and Peterson are pretty safe picks just because of the goal line work. They&#039;re going to be less valuable in PPR leagues though, right?  Any guys you&#039;d really move up in PPR leagues? Would you be crazy enough to take MoJo 1st round in that format?

I&#039;ve got my two drafts this weekend; got the #5 pick in my non-PPR league, so I figure I&#039;ll get either LJ, Addai or Gore...I can live with that. I might just go 3 RB&#039;s to start (since we get a flex), and go more WR heavy in the reception league. I feel like I need a mock draft or something to get ready!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evans worries me, since he&#8217;s kind of long-pass dependent, but he&#8217;s about as good as there is in that department. I know he&#8217;s got the talent, but I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll sneak up on people this season. Without a 2nd receiver, and unless they get the run game going, it just seems like it&#8217;d be very easy to keep a safety on him.</p>
<p>Jacobs and Peterson are pretty safe picks just because of the goal line work. They&#8217;re going to be less valuable in PPR leagues though, right?  Any guys you&#8217;d really move up in PPR leagues? Would you be crazy enough to take MoJo 1st round in that format?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got my two drafts this weekend; got the #5 pick in my non-PPR league, so I figure I&#8217;ll get either LJ, Addai or Gore&#8230;I can live with that. I might just go 3 RB&#8217;s to start (since we get a flex), and go more WR heavy in the reception league. I feel like I need a mock draft or something to get ready!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kritter77</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2007/08/the-scoop-30/comment-page-1/#comment-11464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kritter77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 03:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2007/08/23/the-scoop-30/#comment-11464</guid>
		<description>Pretty good day for Redskins running backs, adding Pete Kendall and Fred Beasley. Kendall has been a very good O-Lineman for a while and Beasley was a Pro Bowl Fullback, what do u think of this move, and it&#039;s fantasy impact? Although personally Im not a big Clinton Portis fantasy fan, he and Betts may have just been given an early XMas present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good day for Redskins running backs, adding Pete Kendall and Fred Beasley. Kendall has been a very good O-Lineman for a while and Beasley was a Pro Bowl Fullback, what do u think of this move, and it&#8217;s fantasy impact? Although personally Im not a big Clinton Portis fantasy fan, he and Betts may have just been given an early XMas present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
