<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wide Receiver Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/</link>
	<description>The Scoop on Fantasy Sports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robby</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Robby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>K-Rob could be pretty good, he&#039;s 29th in our rankings, with my ranking of 34 being the lowest.  I always like to gamble on a potential #1 WR than take a ho-hum #2 guy.  That said, I think that once you get past the top 20-25 WRs, its a real crapshoot among the next 15-20 middle of the pack guys.  The best bet is to grab a few with upside (Robinson being one) and hope at least one pans out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K-Rob could be pretty good, he&#8217;s 29th in our rankings, with my ranking of 34 being the lowest.  I always like to gamble on a potential #1 WR than take a ho-hum #2 guy.  That said, I think that once you get past the top 20-25 WRs, its a real crapshoot among the next 15-20 middle of the pack guys.  The best bet is to grab a few with upside (Robinson being one) and hope at least one pans out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>What about Koren Robinson....He definitely has some upside, but this whole rehab thing is so cloudy, I dont know what to make of it. There is such little competition there, I still want to draft him, but he def. comes with some risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Koren Robinson&#8230;.He definitely has some upside, but this whole rehab thing is so cloudy, I dont know what to make of it. There is such little competition there, I still want to draft him, but he def. comes with some risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 02:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Good rankings, I like them. I&#039;m undecided about Reggie Brown as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good rankings, I like them. I&#8217;m undecided about Reggie Brown as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoScoop</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoScoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-483</guid>
		<description>Wilford definitely deserves consideration. Reggie Williams, whom Sports Illustrated ranked #19 on their WR list last year, is awful. I like Wilford to eventually beat him out and with only Matt Jones to fight for looks, Wilford could easily surprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilford definitely deserves consideration. Reggie Williams, whom Sports Illustrated ranked #19 on their WR list last year, is awful. I like Wilford to eventually beat him out and with only Matt Jones to fight for looks, Wilford could easily surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>I like Wilford, but he must beat out former first round pick Reggie Williams to start opposite Matt Jones.  I believe Wilford is a better option than Williams, but the Jags want to give their high investment one more chance for redemption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Wilford, but he must beat out former first round pick Reggie Williams to start opposite Matt Jones.  I believe Wilford is a better option than Williams, but the Jags want to give their high investment one more chance for redemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.rotoscoop.com/2006/07/wide-receiver-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rotoscoop.com/blog/2006/07/17/wide-receiver-rankings/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that likes Ernest Wilford this year?  I heard he may not start this year, but I find that hard to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that likes Ernest Wilford this year?  I heard he may not start this year, but I find that hard to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

